This is a single anonymous doctor chosen at random from a pool of qualified doctors usually from a TGA committee
So effectively all that is required is convincing one very powerful secret doctor
For instance this is why we are the first country to allow MDMA/psilocybin research to resume since Nixon sent the field underground
Amazing to think how powerful organisations have odd quirks
> This is a single anonymous doctor chosen at random from a pool of qualified doctors usually from a TGA committee
Is this choice made on a per-decision basis, or do they serve terms, or what?
I think the rationale is to minimise both committee biases and corporate influence
I think only a handful of people know who The Delegate is at any one time. The Delegate remains anonymous after the decision is made
I don't see how it really addresses corporate influence; normal behavior from a corporation is to donate to every politician that might conceivably affect them.
The Secretary can make anyone they wish the Delegate on any issue
I should probably rephrase corporate influence as targeted corporate influence
This seems more restrictive than "all related doctors"?
Also,
> The Secretary can make anyone they wish the Delegate on any issue
That sounds like what you want to do is lobby the Secretary. If you're in control of who gets to make the decision, then you get to make the decision.
lol, withholding it would cause massive riots
If you think the riots would be massive for a ban, imagine the riots if there wasn't worldwide access immediately. Biological immortality is very much a situation where you want to bring enough gum for everyone.
Due to the chaos it would kick off, I'm assuming. The FDA just needs to ask themselves "What happens if we OK this?" and if the answer is "I have no idea." they withhold approval.