News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Call of Duty: Warzone Caldera Data Set for Academic Use by jncfhnb on Wednesday July 31, 2024 @12:00AM (#41116326)
Binary is not the equivalent of models. Source code is the equivalent of models.

It doesn’t matter if a machine generated source code or a human did for it to be open source code.

Re:Call of Duty: Warzone Caldera Data Set for Academic Use by EnigmaFlare on Wednesday July 31, 2024 @03:01AM (#41116960)
You keep asserting this but without any reason. Do you have a reason? It seems to go against the general open source idea of source code being convenient for people to modify.
Re:Call of Duty: Warzone Caldera Data Set for Academic Use by jncfhnb on Wednesday July 31, 2024 @08:22AM (#41118596)
ML weights ARE convenient for people to modify. You can go look at the dozens of modifications of diffusion models being produced, daily, on civit ai. It’s very easy.
Re:Call of Duty: Warzone Caldera Data Set for Academic Use by EnigmaFlare on Thursday August 01, 2024 @10:54PM (#41135714)
Would you say that once a model is trained, there's no need to go back and re-train it, even if you want to, say, remove some material from the training set? Anything can be done just with the weights? That's a big surprise to me.

Of course people hack binaries too, and binaries are obviously not source code. I once edited a book in PDF form because we didn't have the original Word/whatever document. It's not hard but a PDF still isn't considered to be source code for documentation despite that.