News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The lie of music discovery algorithms by karaterobot on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @07:14PM (#41115039)
I would naively assume that both Spotify and Tidal pull that information from the same sources. Hopefully there is a web service. Not to take anything away from the first person who decided to, you know, actually tell us this information. At this point it should be table stakes for a music streaming service-indeed, it should be a legal requirement if you ask me.
Re:The lie of music discovery algorithms by cush on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @08:46PM (#41115530)
They 100% do not pull from the same sources.

Hey Jude by The Beatles - Tidal lists 22 different people who worked on this song. Spotify lists 3.

Re:The lie of music discovery algorithms by karaterobot on Wednesday July 31, 2024 @10:28AM (#41119478)
Thanks, that's really surprising. Credits get into ownership and payment, and I assumed some group of authorities would have that on lock, and would have pooled all their data since it's sort of in their interest to do so. Silly me I guess!
Re:The lie of music discovery algorithms by cush on Wednesday July 31, 2024 @09:00PM (#41125218)
Spotify just pays the owner of the song (typically a record label) so doesn't need to be concerned with who created it. But yeah, even then, it's surprising the Spotify credits are so poor. Everyone forgets about Ringo!
Re:The lie of music discovery algorithms by iggldiggl on Friday August 02, 2024 @08:50AM (#41138441)
Session musicians mostly only receive a one-time fee and no royalties, so would be irrelevant from a subsequent payment distribution perspective.