To be clear dominance is where one player owns market majority. That is not Twitter. There is lots of evidence on this. Twitter might dominate Truth Social but it still lags far behind Facebook, TikTok, and probably Instagram.
Vendor lock-in is where the cost to switch to an alternative is supremely expensive, such as rebuilding infrastructure from the ground up. That is radically different than the stupidity of not knowing what your options are.
They are extremely consistent in being extremely dishonest.
The ones complaining about media manipulation are the ones manipulating the media.
The ones complaining about coups and violence are the ones attempting coups and committing violence.
The ones complaining about rigged elections are the ones rigging the elections.
The ones complaining about pedophiles and groomers are the ones committing those acts.
Every time. Every. Single. Time.
What is interesting to me is that the a great many established accounts on Twitter would love to leave the platform due to it being owned by Musk. They don’t/can’t/haven’t left Twitter due to network effects. How long these users remain on Twitter is a measure of the power of Twitter’s entrenched position. The only real policy on Twitter is whatever Musk wants at a given time. No one should expect consistency in policy enforcement on Twitter.