News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New study simulates gravitational waves from failing warp... by JumpCrisscross on Monday July 29, 2024 @03:50PM (#41103184)
> being able to move space around a ship faster than the speed of light seem to require orders of magnitude different energies

They require different kinds of energies. Specifically, the latter requires negative energy, something we have no evidence exists.

> being in a 'warp bubble' doesn't mean that bubble is traveling at super luminal speeds

Nobody claimed as much. The physically-possible warp bubble lets you slow down time. So a 100,000-year journey would feel, to the ship’s occupants (and its structure and computers, et cetera), like possibly months.

(You also get the capability to transport people and things forward in time without degradation. Or, I believe, to speed up time inside e.g. a production or computational environment.)

Re:New study simulates gravitational waves from failing warp... by altruios on Monday July 29, 2024 @03:57PM (#41103235)
> The physically-possible warp bubble lets you slow down time.

that... seems odd to me. without substantial changes in velocity - how does a warp bubble (that's sub-luminal - so relativistic velocities) alter the fabric of space-time so fantastically? It's not moving fast: so where does the time dilation come from?!

Re:New study simulates gravitational waves from failing warp... by JumpCrisscross on Monday July 29, 2024 @04:06PM (#41103295)
> not moving fast: so where does the time dilation come from?!

I think it’s from shifting momentum?? The paper is far beyond me [1]. But as I understood it, you’re directly modifying space-time with energy instead of using acceleration as a go-between.

[1] https://arxiv.org/html/2405.02709v1

Re:New study simulates gravitational waves from failing warp... by ben_w on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @02:23AM (#41106511)
The mass distribution in the metric can do that; IIRC this was chosen in order to not have time dilation, so I think someone's getting confused (and maybe that someone is me?)