Re:You can opt out of airport face scans
by sofixa on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @11:10AM
(#41057876)
> > [T]he cumulative delays from TSA "security" have had a much, much larger human cost than the destruction of the WTC towers.
> Do try to keep up.
Still looking for that source that TSA has killed people.
> How do you get them past a metal detector? Remember that most explosives are metallic. If your answer is to shove them up your ass into your intestines or down your throat into your stomach, then note that that method also defeats both the pornoscanners and the patdowns and ask yourself why noone has detonated a grenade or blown out a portion of the fuselage with an explosive in the ~15 years that TSA has been using scanners, or the ~9 between 2001 and 2010 [0] where they were "just" using metal detectors.
I thought you only need two things? A hardened cockpit door and passenger knowledge about the dangers of hijackins. Now you need metal detectors too? Please try to keep up with your own argument.
> Do try to keep up.
Still looking for that source that TSA has killed people.
> How do you get them past a metal detector? Remember that most explosives are metallic. If your answer is to shove them up your ass into your intestines or down your throat into your stomach, then note that that method also defeats both the pornoscanners and the patdowns and ask yourself why noone has detonated a grenade or blown out a portion of the fuselage with an explosive in the ~15 years that TSA has been using scanners, or the ~9 between 2001 and 2010 [0] where they were "just" using metal detectors.
I thought you only need two things? A hardened cockpit door and passenger knowledge about the dangers of hijackins. Now you need metal detectors too? Please try to keep up with your own argument.