Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by AMICABoard on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @04:07AM
(#41054675)
Maybe we should make "Brain Damage Factor" a official term to denote how much types of quantizations degrade output compared to unquantized.:)
I think that's known as degradation, but I think the brain damage metric could be usefully applies to the poor sods who try to get the quantization to work in the first place.
Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by AMICABoard on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @06:27AM
(#41055493)
Lol :)
Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by impossiblefork on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @04:55AM
(#41054982)
There's actually an old paper titled Optimal Brain Damage, where they don't try to find optimal quantizations, but optimal sparse versions of a models-- i.e. where some weights are set to zero.
Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by AMICABoard on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @06:28AM
(#41055503)
Interesting, I heard something like that, but now I must read about it.
Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by nickpsecurity on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @10:06AM
(#41057264)
I found…
Optimal Brain Damage https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221618539_Optimal_B...
Optimal Brain Compression https://openreview.net/pdf?id=ksVGCOlOEba#:~:text=The%20resu....
TinyVolt’s implementation of it: https://github.com/TinyVolt/optimal-brain-compression
Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by AMICABoard on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @10:27AM
(#41057459)
Thanks, I'll read it up. Interesting.
Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by nickpsecurity on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @10:35AM
(#41057537)
That was really for them. You’re out there building neat stuff. Your talent might warrant looking into AdderNets and Bitnets which might get the cost down. There’s also some brain-inspired designs.
I don’t think many people have implemented such things. You might discover something new experimenting with them.
Re:Llama 3.1 in C
by AMICABoard on Wednesday July 24, 2024 @12:35PM
(#41058815)
:)
Love the wording.