News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenResearch Unconditional Cash Study's first findings av... by whakim on Monday July 22, 2024 @02:22PM (#41037788)
> And similar proposals like the Negative Income Tax would cost far less money and have none of the presented downsides.

It all depends on how you tweak the numbers; in theory a negative income tax and a guaranteed income cost exactly the same amount. A guaranteed income of $1200 taxed at a marginal rate of 50% is just the same as a marginal tax rate of -50% on an income of $400. That being said, there are some pretty big negative externalities to a negative income tax, in the sense that it even further overburdens the tax system with knowing people's exact monthly income (assuming monthly payments), which is not-at-all straightforward for the poorest taxpayers whom presumably such a system would be designed to most help.

Re:OpenResearch Unconditional Cash Study's first findings av... by akvadrako on Tuesday July 23, 2024 @09:05AM (#41045576)
They are mathematically the same, depending on the tax curves.

A negative income tax doesn't mean you get -50% of $400, it means your income starts negative. So someone making $0 gets like $1000 back (say by paying 20% over -$5000).