That is not what am saying, I am saying open sourcing doesn’t cause more problems than proprietary systems which is the argument OP was making .
Open source is not a panacea, it is just not objectively worse as OP implies.
On the other hand, anyone serious about malware development already has "the actual source code", either for defensive operations and offensive operations.
Bazzar works absolutely fine for security, Linux kernel is one project which does this , all security infrastructure uses it one way or another. The tens of thousands of patches and forks has not once been discovered to have the subtle bug/vulnerability scenario intentionally submitted yet in 30 years .
There seems to be a lot of misconceptions in this thread what open source is or can do. Most of my points have been made by people much better than me for decades now.
Eventually that's something that gets exposed anyways, but I think the crucial part is timing and being a few steps ahead in the cat and mouse game. Otherwise I'm not sure what kind of proof would even be meaningful here.