News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LWN debates whether using GPL software on missiles counts... by tibbon on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @11:08AM (#4100807)
I do suppose it would be better to just be able to force them to obey the GPL (and distribute their code), than disallow them to use it.
Re:LWN debates whether using GPL software on missiles counts... by excuse-me on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @01:19PM (#4101535)
There are sometimes operational difficulties in 'forcing' the owner of a nuclear armed carrier battlefleet to obey anything.

It's even worse than trying to force a teenager to tidy their room!

Re:LWN debates whether using GPL software on missiles counts... by EthanG on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @02:40PM (#4102018)
I have to agree with the general principle of this. Hanging on my sister's kitchen wall is a tea-towel printed with a record of a delightful conversation between US and Canadian forces. They each insist the other should divert course. The US forces describe what they are - a carrier group, and again insist that the Canadian forces divert course. The Canadian forces simply reply, "This is a lighthouse." ;)

With all that said, I don't think it applies to licenses at all. Licenses are paperwork. Do I need to say more?

Re:LWN debates whether using GPL software on missiles counts... by tibbon on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @03:11PM (#4102195)
It isn't about the armed forces themselves, as they rarely make their own arms. Most weapons companies are publicly traded corporations.