News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by Supermancho on Friday July 19, 2024 @12:21PM (#41008076)
I immediately wonder how this affected the EOL conditions of those mice.
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by rexreed on Friday July 19, 2024 @12:29PM (#41008172)
They outlived their retirement savings and had to re-enter the workforce. It's just a rat race, isn't it.
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by hi_hello on Friday July 19, 2024 @03:17PM (#41010047)
Not to mention the radical cost of living adjustment, renting some hole in the wall just to squeak by.
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by beowulfey on Friday July 19, 2024 @01:15PM (#41008704)
Article states they had fewer biomarkers of aging, and showed less age-associated obesity, fraility, and metabolic decline. So their "youth" period extended longer.

Actually the point of healthspan vs lifespan is made in the introduction -- it was a justification for using mice for this study, which have clear health phenotypes that are analogous to humans.

Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by PaulHoule on Friday July 19, 2024 @01:20PM (#41008759)
I'm basically skeptical of any longevity study in mice or yeast or C. Elegans because I think humans already have superior longevity factors over other animals because of our culture: we can live 3x reproductive age and still contribute to the survival of our descendants and our tribe.

Metabolic adaptations that prolong the life of mice might be just bringing them closer to where we are as opposed to something that would work for us.

Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by semperdark on Saturday July 20, 2024 @10:26AM (#41016727)
Unmodified C elegans can certainly live to 3x reproductive age, fwiw. These are all simplistic model organisms by definition but many nearly identical proteins are found in humans and there’s value to studying their structure and function in a very well-known environment. I wouldn’t take it as “just delete IL11 and you’ll live to 130!” but the fact that it’s presented that way is more the fault of marketing departments and science writers.
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by gumby on Friday July 19, 2024 @02:05PM (#41009281)
It switched them from CRLF to \n?
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by xk_id on Friday July 19, 2024 @05:35PM (#41011608)
The only significant, deleterious phenotype in il-11 KO mice is the inability to sustain pregnancy. So far it seems to have a very high safety profile.
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by ChrisArchitect on Friday July 19, 2024 @01:22PM (#41008777)
Re:Deletion of Il11 extended the lives of mice by 25% by whlh on Sunday July 21, 2024 @06:16AM (#41023933)
This is fascinating! The idea that deleting IL-11 can extend mouse lifespan by 25% is mind-blowing. It makes you wonder about the potential implications for aging research in humans. Could this be a breakthrough, or just another interesting anomaly? Anyone else thinking about the long-term effects or possible applications in human medicine?