Re:LWN debates whether using GPL software on missiles counts...
by excuse-me on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @09:00AM
(#4100196)
You have to supply the code used in products that you distribute - hence the whole Tivo issue.
So the argument is - have you distributed the missile to the firers or to the target?
That's what the AGPL sorts out. Is being hit by a missil a 'service'
Re:LWN debates whether using GPL software on missiles counts...
by Symmetry on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @09:38AM
(#4100359)
This is sort of hilarious, but I'm pretty sure that firing a missile at someone doesn't count as giving them code. Its not your intent that they're able to use the missile for their own purposes, for example.
Re:LWN debates whether using GPL software on missiles counts...
by excuse-me on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @11:41AM
(#4100983)
Your intent isn't important - it's the intent of the person licensing the software.
I publish my shark+laser beam integration library in the hope that other evil geniuses will use it and improve on it. Together we can produce an opensource shark+laser beam system that is more secure and reliable than the commercial offering. When you are an evil genius you have to worry about these things.
Assuming that they are not selling them to someone rather than firing them at someone, of course.