Re:USPS shared customer postal addresses with Meta, LinkedIn...
by rahimnathwani on Thursday July 18, 2024 @04:55PM
(#40999663)
Yeah semantic drift haha...
https://chatgpt.com/share/3331fdec-c69c-46b0-9ffe-c48848fb29...
Re:USPS shared customer postal addresses with Meta, LinkedIn...
by CyberDildonics on Thursday July 18, 2024 @07:13PM
(#41000624)
I don't know why you're being downvoted, calling full access javascript embedded into a page a 'tracking pixel' is a total lie. Then again 'serverless' is where you use a server, so the track record isn't great.
Re:USPS shared customer postal addresses with Meta, LinkedIn...
by rahimnathwani on Thursday July 18, 2024 @07:34PM
(#41000752)
I guess most people reading this already knew that the term 'tracking pixel' has evolved beyond its original meaning, and is now commonly understood to include all sorts of tracking code.
I did not, but now I know :)
(And although serverless doesn't mean 'no server', we know what the word means and it doesn't cause confusion.)
Re:USPS shared customer postal addresses with Meta, LinkedIn...
by ziml77 on Thursday July 18, 2024 @09:48PM
(#41001450)
I also didn't know and I definitely don't like how it underplays the capabilities of the tracking.
Re:USPS shared customer postal addresses with Meta, LinkedIn...
by everybodyknows on Thursday July 18, 2024 @11:34PM
(#41001846)
>serverless
Doesn't the term confuse anyone hearing it for the first time? It sure did me.
In that world, third party ‘tags’ that are included in a page are generally referred to as ‘pixels’. Sometimes they are single pixel img tags. Frequently they are scripts. But the industry calls them ‘pixels’ anyway.
It is, surprisingly, not a terribly honest industry.