Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by Sohcahtoa82 on Thursday July 18, 2024 @01:57PM
(#40998148)
Take a loss on every sale and make up for it with volume!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by OutOfHere on Thursday July 18, 2024 @02:23PM
(#40998367)
> Take a loss on every sale and make up for it with volume!
If you take a loss on every sale, it is impossible to make up for it with volume. The result will be a loss magnified by the volume.
Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by Sohcahtoa82 on Thursday July 18, 2024 @02:32PM
(#40998433)
It's a joke. Sadly, the origin is unknown, but it's a joke that's well over 10 years old.
Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by ben_w on Thursday July 18, 2024 @05:17PM
(#40999842)
I believe it originates in the original dot.com bubble.
Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by dllthomas on Saturday July 20, 2024 @07:05PM
(#41020866)
I'm pretty sure I heard it in an econ class, which would have been around y2k. From the way it was presented I had the sense that it was already well known.
Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by thatsnotmepls on Thursday July 18, 2024 @02:31PM
(#40998423)
Guess you missed the sarcasm.
Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by OutOfHere on Thursday July 18, 2024 @10:03PM
(#41001508)
Sarcasm is generally expected to be suffixed with /s. In this case, significant historical context is required to detect it.
Re:GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence
by dragonwriter on Thursday July 18, 2024 @08:54PM
(#41001170)
Take a loss on every sale to drive less-well-funded competitors out of the market, and then reap monopoly rents.