Re:Erlang vs. Stackless Python: a first benchmark
by tdavis on Thursday December 25, 2008 @08:22PM
(#409876)
I don't think Stackless is nearly as well-known as it should be. It has a solid value proposition and is blazing fast in my experience as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Erlang vs. Stackless Python: a first benchmark
by inklesspen on Friday December 26, 2008 @03:48PM
(#410393)
Stackless is missing some important parts. I've spent a great deal of time working with it over the past few months, and there's no good SSL socket support. The built-in socket module will block the entire process (all tasklets), and while drop-in replacements exist, they either don't work with SSL, are buggy, or both.
Stackless also lacks Erlang's transparent support for multi-process and multi-machine execution, though I talked to a guy who's working on adding that for his Master's degree.
Re:Erlang vs. Stackless Python: a first benchmark
by tdavis on Friday December 26, 2008 @05:59PM
(#410518)
I'll be the first to admit that http socket issues exist and drop-in replacements are indeed often buggy. That being said, this wouldn't be a huge issue to overcome were Stackless given more TLC. Regardless, it has many other valuable uses.