Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi...
by throwaway3306a on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @02:02AM
(#40983009)
What, pay for receiving messages? I have never seen that, not during roaming or even on IoT plans or completely free plans.
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi...
by p_l on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @06:26AM
(#40984363)
Was(is?) common in USA
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi...
by throwaway3306a on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @09:33AM
(#40985763)
How does that even work? What if I spam you from a free sms gateway / unlimited sms plan?
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi...
by p_l on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @09:44AM
(#40985876)
AFAIK it resulted in huge bill for the receiver, though I have no idea if certain services weren't billed differently (wouldn't surprise me if you could send text messages that were billed only on sender side, for extra)
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi...
by aembleton on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @06:39AM
(#40984442)
Maybe its different in other countries
Re:Stop Microsoft users sending 'reactions' to email by addi...
by logicprog on Wednesday July 17, 2024 @06:38AM
(#40984430)
> So, they have to ask each and every one of their iMessage-using friends to please not send these ridiculous reactions, because they are ultimately another text message which will cost money. If that counts as "forcing others to adapt their communication
No, it doesn't, because that's engaging in bilateral negotiation of how the communication will go with the others involved in it. Unilaterally disabling the feature, however, is different, and that is what I was criticizing.
Ultimately, this is something that I'd rather be handled at the carrier layer: I should be able to have my phone reject a text message and not pay for / receive it.
On the topic of configurability: Software should ultimately serve the end user. When a developer makes an undesirable (to a user) change to the software and provides the user no way to opt out of that change, it's serving the developer's interests, and it's doing a slightly worse job at serving the user.