News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Digital Markup: 129,000% by tylerneylon on Monday June 11, 2012 @08:34PM (#4097972)
Some commenters say the post is wrong to complain when the author is making money through amazon's distribution, or when amazon takes a loss on selling kindles.

I disagree with both sentiments.

Main point: It does not cost amazon an average of $2.58 to deliver the author's pdf. Amazon is being dishonest by calling this a delivery cost. I consider it unethical to name a fee something that it is not.

"Be grateful for what you do get" is not a valid argument against dishonesty. If Amazon makes a business decision to take a loss on kindles, this also does not justify dishonesty.

Re:Amazon Digital Markup: 129,000% by nandemo on Tuesday June 12, 2012 @12:13AM (#4098717)
It's called "delivery fee", not "delivery cost". It makes no sense to require a business to charge fees solely based on variable costs.
Re:Amazon Digital Markup: 129,000% by smackfu on Friday June 15, 2012 @10:13AM (#4116562)
So many commenters seem to see the $2.58 as Amazon saying "this is what it really costs us". I'd think it means something more like "this is punitively high so please make your book smaller."