And then when you open the pages for say “Topic1”, you get an automatic inline “timeline” of all your thoughts on that topic. I find that this way of writing makes me procrastinate less with polishing the pages themselves, while giving a valuable recollection of how my ideas on that topic evolved over time (which is useful when later e.g. writing a paper on that topic).
With that said, I’ve also gotten nervous after Logseq’s quiet period, especially since they use a non-standard Markdown dialect that doesn’t work well in other apps. I also find Obsidian lacking in the outliner department. Recently, I’ve therefore gone back to Emacs Org-mode. I can use it in a similar way to Logseq (with Org Roam), and feel safer that it will continue to be developed for the next decade or more. As an added benefit, I now have CDLaTeX and Evil available.
I especially like the workflow of writing basically everything in the journal, in an outline like:
And then when you open the pages for say “Topic1”, you get an automatic inline “timeline” of all your thoughts on that topic. I find that this way of writing makes me procrastinate less with polishing the pages themselves, while giving a valuable recollection of how my ideas on that topic evolved over time (which is useful when later e.g. writing a paper on that topic).With that said, I’ve also gotten nervous after Logseq’s quiet period, especially since they use a non-standard Markdown dialect that doesn’t work well in other apps. I also find Obsidian lacking in the outliner department. Recently, I’ve therefore gone back to Emacs Org-mode. I can use it in a similar way to Logseq (with Org Roam), and feel safer that it will continue to be developed for the next decade or more. As an added benefit, I now have CDLaTeX and Evil available.