We need superknowledge before superintelligence

Re:We need superknowledge before superintelligence by talldayo on Friday July 12, 2024 @03:50PM (#40948777)

This is just blatant self-promotion. I'm not a fan of Google either, but running my last 5 searches through Exa I'm not even getting DuckDuckGo-quality responses. And you're advertising yourself in the corner, patting your own back in blogposts, ushering me towards a pricing page and telling me scary stories before I go.

Maybe we should stop super-washing things and sell products on their literal merit. Google isn't the premier search provider because they're "super" anything, they're successful because they're free and get out of your way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need superknowledge before superintelligence by sujumayas on Friday July 12, 2024 @04:20PM (#40949040)

Also, the current AI advancements result from walking away from knowledge-semantic-logic AI methodologies into more statistics-generative approaches. This is also a result of those methodologies not working properly because of the unsolvable problem of infinite knowledge = infinite space (a HD/compute unsolvable problem) // Infinite divisibility / synthesis of knowledge (also a physical/compute/HD unsolvable problem. Right?

[ Parent | on HN ]