Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by RandallBrown on Thursday July 11, 2024 @12:40PM
(#40938371)
I feel like this was one of the original selling points of Google's ads. They were pretty simple, unobtrusive, mostly text, ads.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by Sylamore on Thursday July 11, 2024 @01:12PM
(#40938628)
The doubleclick acquisition was the end of that.
Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by joquarky on Thursday July 11, 2024 @07:36PM
(#40941568)
Isn't that when the business majors took over?
Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by JadeNB on Thursday July 11, 2024 @04:42PM
(#40940446)
> I feel like this was one of the original selling points of Google's ads. They were pretty simple, unobtrusive, mostly text, ads.
One of the original factors in the rapid uptake of Chrome was believed to be that the ads for it were the first time an ad appeared on google.com.
Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by Thorrez on Thursday July 11, 2024 @06:26PM
(#40941169)
There were ads on google.com since at least 2000[1]. Chrome wasn't announced until 2008. Disclosure: I work at Google but not on ads or Chrome.
[1] https://googlepress.blogspot.com/2000/10/google-launches-sel...
Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by rezonant on Thursday July 11, 2024 @07:37PM
(#40941573)
I believe they meant on https://google.com (the home page)
Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by Thorrez on Friday July 12, 2024 @03:11AM
(#40943327)
Oh, I didn't think of that. But I don't think that's really true either. There seem to be ads on the homepage before Chrome:
Google News: https://web.archive.org/web/20021001073516/http://www.google...
Google Calendar: https://web.archive.org/web/20060831050142/http://www.google...
For comparison, Chrome: https://web.archive.org/web/20080904192205/http://www.google...
Now admittedly the Chrome one is a bit flashier. Although I haven't exhaustively gone through every homepage variant before Chrome, so it's possible there was something as flashy before Chrome as well.
Re:Second Factor SMS: Worse Than Its Reputation
by JadeNB on Friday July 12, 2024 @08:23PM
(#40950689)
Ah, either the author of the article I'm dimly remembering was mistaken, or, much more likely, they correctly inserted some caveat that made the claim true, and the precise caveat was just lost to my faulty memory and the mists of time. I didn't bother trying to check the Wayback Machine because, for some reason, I was convinced that Google would have requested that the home page not be crawled; thank you for doing it!