News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Typeset of Wall·E (2018) by Sharlin on Thursday July 11, 2024 @09:18AM (#40936457)
To be fair, traditionally 95% of digital content has zero amount of typographical finesse and simply uses whatever is available in the local standard keyboard layout. Even the use of em and n dashes is a big deal.
Re:The Typeset of Wall·E (2018) by dcminter on Thursday July 11, 2024 @10:31AM (#40937244)
The decimal currency in the UK is essentially the same age as me - and I have never heard this claim that an interpunct is somehow more official. So the claim stood out to me as being outlandish; not impossible, just super unlikely.

To show I have no ill will toward outlandish Britishisms, this one applied in Parliament until relatively recently...

"To increase their appearance during debates and to be seen more easily, a Member wishing to raise a point of order during a division was, until 1998, required to speak with his hat on. Collapsible top hats were kept for the purpose."

https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-inf...

Re:The Typeset of Wall·E (2018) by Sharlin on Thursday July 11, 2024 @11:45AM (#40937907)
Yeah, I don't doubt you, just meant that web copy is usually so typographically impoverished compared to print that it's not in itself much of evidence.
Re:The Typeset of Wall·E (2018) by ascorbic on Friday July 12, 2024 @03:48AM (#40943474)
True, but not in the case of gov.uk typography, which has had a huge amount of thought put into it. e.g. https://designnotes.blog.gov.uk/2022/12/12/making-the-gov-uk... https://www.gov.uk/guidance/style-guide/a-to-z-of-gov-uk-sty...