Re:GitHub Copilot is not infringing your copyright
by bluesign on Thursday July 11, 2024 @10:17AM
(#40937082)
yeah the problem here is there is no 'code A' usually, it is more like: 1000s of GPLed code (A1, A2, ... An )
Technically when you get a piece from each, there is no infringement legally. ( as they have all different copyright holders )
Re:GitHub Copilot is not infringing your copyright
by bayindirh on Friday July 12, 2024 @02:20AM
(#40943101)
From my understanding of a blog post by GitHub last year, they are planning to launch a tool to find similar code to what emitted by CoPilot, implying that CoPilot does not mix multiple sources for a single function, but derives a code block it found with a similar functionality (or maybe bigger blocks with similar functionality, IDK).
If CoPilot indeed derives a function (or a functional block) from a single source, it might plainly violate the license of the repository where it derives the code from.
There are many questions, and nothing is clear cut. The only thing I know is, I will never use that thing.
EDIT: I remembered that people were able to make CoPilot emit their code almost as-is with the correct prompts: https://x.com/docsparse/status/1581461734665367554
So it's not we're taking a bit from n different sources, and generate something with that.
Re:GitHub Copilot is not infringing your copyright
by anticensor on Friday July 12, 2024 @04:16PM
(#40949008)
> Technically when you get a piece from each, there is no infringement legally.
False in ex-Commonwealth countries and Japan.
At what measure is one sufficiently inspired for it to be a derivate work? That is up to courts to decide.