News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The NYT Book Review Is Everything Book Criticism Shouldn'... by sph on Thursday July 11, 2024 @07:22AM (#40935481)
> All art is political.

Nonsense. Art is strongly related to culture, and culture is strongly related to politics. The fact that art these days is very much viewed in a political frame, in the US in this case, is because politics have taken a huge role in US culture. Like, it's all American people seem to be thinking about these days.

But no, art is not political in itself. Art, by some definition, is a thing whose meaning is created by who experiences it. Art might look political if the observer looks at it in a political point-of-view. But in reality, tinned faeces [1] are not a political statement nor a reflection on the human condition. They are literally just shit in a box.

1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist%27s_Shit

Re:The NYT Book Review Is Everything Book Criticism Shouldn'... by aorist on Thursday July 11, 2024 @10:04AM (#40936969)
I think this is too strong. If art has no inherent meaning, you can't say that it's not making a political statement, only that whether it's making a political statment or not is undefined.

Otherwise, saying that something is not making a political statement is actually a very strong political statement in itself (e.g. things which are "not political" can't be negotiated or changed).