News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Flame Explained by moconnor on Monday June 11, 2012 @03:05AM (#4093499)
Despite being a top science student at school, I learned more in those 7 minutes than any given 7 minutes of a science class in my life.

Could more of education look like this? Why doesn't it?

Re:The Flame Explained by pilif on Monday June 11, 2012 @08:46AM (#4094293)
While everything the video was talking about is correct, this also only scratches the surface of what is going on (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redox). Science at school has to go into much more detail to prepare you for when you chose chemistry as your topic for University.

A comparable video that actually gives all that detail is very hard to do (if it's at all possible) and it's also likely to be very boring - unless you are into chemistry at which point you don't need a video like this in the first place because the books are perfectly fine for you (they were for me and I have nothing but interest into chemistry - no education aside of what you'd get in High-School).

Re:The Flame Explained by guard-of-terra on Monday June 11, 2012 @10:58AM (#4094935)
But why does school have to prepare you for every college there is, including those you aren't going to attend?

95% high schoolers aren't going to any college requiring chemistry. Why not teach the fun and memorable flame to them, instead of boring chemistry flame they wouldn't understand or remember?

Re:The Flame Explained by marquis on Monday June 11, 2012 @10:44AM (#4094840)
Why does it have to be boring? A good science teacher and method can make all elements fascinating. I'd reference the Feynman lectures as an example of this.