News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lix 2.90 "Vanilla Ice Cream" by nxrabl on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @11:22PM (#40933397)
This seems like such a no-brainer architectural choice that it makes me wonder if there's some tradeoff I'm not seeing. Why would Nix have cached failures in the first place?
Re:Lix 2.90 "Vanilla Ice Cream" by n8henrie on Thursday July 11, 2024 @09:29AM (#40936586)
It seems to make more sense than not having them to me -- nix is all about reproducibility. If you didn't change anything, why would you get a different result? Instead of spending 15 seconds on evaluations, just tell me "you didn't change anything doofus -- cached error."