News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Senators strike bipartisan deal for ban on stock trading ... by Aurornis on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @03:33PM (#40930593)
I never understood the obsession with Nancy Pelosi specifically (not by you, but by the people who named that ETF and all of the news headlines) in the context of senate trading.

Her recent returns are high, but they’re right up there with several other Republican and Democrat lawmakers: https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1742207287966777673

It’s even stranger that inception date of the $NANC ETF was after she announced she was stepping down as Democratic Party leader.

I guess the name triggers controversy, so the people pushing these products use whatever sells.

Re:Senators strike bipartisan deal for ban on stock trading ... by chucksta on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @03:54PM (#40930832)
I assumed it was because she was speaker at the time at least when this popped off recently.
Re:Senators strike bipartisan deal for ban on stock trading ... by twothreeone on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @03:50PM (#40930800)
Yeah, collecting fees is easy money.
Re:Senators strike bipartisan deal for ban on stock trading ... by nicodemus26 on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @05:05PM (#40931467)
It's due to her specific comments as Speaker of the House when leading a vote to dismantle prohibitions established during the Obama admin.

> when asked whether lawmakers and their spouses should be prohibited from trading stock while in Congress, Pelosi said, “No,” adding that “this is a free market.”

https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-86...

It's also because her family profits disproportionately:

> Pelosi's husband, investor Paul Pelosi, frequently trades significant numbers of stocks. With her husband's assets considered, Pelosi ranks among the wealthiest members of Congress, an Insider analysis found.

https://www.businessinsider.com/we-are-free-market-economy-p...