News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs by sberens on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @11:44PM (#40923497)
How long do you expect LLMs/agents to be unable to do this?
Re:From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs by charlescurt123 on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @11:58PM (#40923563)
Good question, I'm working on exactly this, I suppose you could call it the replacement of RAG.

It's actually not very easy to achieve this. I could give a very long winded answer (don't tempt me) but suffice to say it's a resolution problem.

All AI have a fixed resolution on creation. Long running tasks focus on a very particular narrowing space per step, the resolution required for an infinite task is infinite resolution.

No 9s of error will ever fix this.

Funny enough, small animals do this with ease so I strongly disagree the idea that our AI outcompete even small mammals in every way.

Re:From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs by nvy on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @11:52PM (#40923530)
Personally, I think that phenomenon (along with "hallucinations") is fundamentally baked into LLMs writ large.

I think LLMs are a dead end on the path to AGI.

Re:From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs by charlescurt123 on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @11:59PM (#40923572)
I think hallucinations are actually the sign that LLMs are far closer to a real brain than we realize.

I think hallucinations are a major unsearched gateway to AGI.

Re:From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs by lostmsu on Wednesday July 10, 2024 @01:24AM (#40923956)
I agree. Whenever people complain about LLM hallucinations they behave like they never seen one in humans.

Not only humans hallucinate all the time, humans also have persistent hallucinations as evident from the presence of opposing beliefs in various slices of society.