Re:The Macroeconomics of Chinese kleptocracy
by jasonwatkinspdx on Sunday June 10, 2012 @12:46PM
(#4091503)
I don't see how what you're saying addresses anything in the article. What am I missing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Macroeconomics of Chinese kleptocracy
by crdoconnor on Sunday June 10, 2012 @12:58PM
(#4091522)
It sounds like "kleptocracy is fine provided it doesn't cause a boom/bust cycle".
Re:The Macroeconomics of Chinese kleptocracy
by jasonwatkinspdx on Sunday June 10, 2012 @02:30PM
(#4091760)
To elaborate: I can understand how temporarily forcing a negative nominal savings rates on a population might be beneficial in the short term in the Keynesian sense.
But a forced, regressive negative real savings rate? I cannot think of a moral justification for that.