I wouldn’t have imagined that a fall off of the second step of a ladder could result in the destruction of a 40 year old wedding ring either, but here we are!
Plus a new "can't hurt myself with this if I tried" ring for any time spent outside.
Most commercial grades of Titanium can be cut with common tools. The tools will dull faster, but it's not impossible.
I suspect a lot of the stories about Ti rings being impossible to cut are coming from people who confuse Titanium with Tungsten. People get exotic metals mixed up all the time.
On the other hand, if you pulled it from the scrap bin you may have gotten some extreme aerospace grade of Titanium that really is difficult to cut.
Most of the rings referred to as Tungsten rings are actually Tungsten Carbide. Tungsten Carbide rings, by comparison, is VERY hard to cut. You basically need a diamond blade/saw/grinding wheel to cut through TC.
I saw a video of someone making a ring out of polycrystalline diamond and…if that gets stuck for some reason, it's never coming off.
I can confirm that it works. I heartily recommend a face shield, and I wouldn't want to be the first guy the doctor had to break a ring off of.
The biggest difficulty that I know of with it is that the material is not very workable, and so if you need to get the ring resized, you may be out of luck.
Diamond is easy to remove: it'll melt with a blowtorch.
(You didn't say the finger had to be preserved intact...)
Now I’m curious: why use any nickel at all? Plenty of stainless steels (including, AIUI, basically all the tool steels) don’t use nickel, and many of them have excellent corrosion resistance. Is austentitic steel enough easier to machine to make it worthwhile?
Longer answer: It was 20 years ago, and we aren't exactly metallurgists. IIRC, at the time it was something to do with a variety of "surgical stainless" to focus on the best corrosion resistance combined with something that was somewhat machinable. At the time, I think we were comparing 304 (easier to machine, much worse corrosion resistance) vs. 316 (harder to machine, but much better corrosion resistance). I think looking at metals that we were able to source in partial lengths might have been a factor as well.
In hindsight, one might be able to find something with better properties in a more specialized alloy, but if I had to do it over again, I would 100% be willing to choose the 316L again. I have zero complaints with it, and the corrosion resistance it offers is superb. In 20 years, I've never polished my ring once, and it still has that mirror-finish quality (especially on the inside where it has never brushed concrete).
I rarely take the ring off (sometimes when juggling) -- I don't worry about it and leave it on even when using tools or scrambling up a rock ledge or carrying cinder blocks or whatever. Very occasionally it will get scratches (concrete is one of the few things that has left a mark from time to time), but they're never very severe scratches, and they buff out nice and naturally over time. I imagine that I would be much more concerned about a softer precious metal, and I'm glad I have a more durable ring instead.
Well, you could also just live with the scratches in your ring (if you had one made of eg silver) and declare them part of how it matures with the passage of time. Just like copper gets a patina, too.
(I'm glad you are happy with your ring! I'm just saying that if people decide to be happy, they'll find a justification to be happy with what they have. And if they decide to be unhappy, they'll find a reason, too.)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/001093...
Conclusion: 304 and 316 are probably fine, as is 430 (which should be entirely unsurprising due to its near lack of nickel), but 303 would be a poor choice.
https://www.instructables.com/Home-Oven-Steel-TemperingColor...
Reading that page, it's interesting that the stainless steel rivets and fastener hardware are the only bits that didn't color. Quoting from the article:
> It is possible that the stainless steel might start to color if left in the oven for longer but my cursory research lead me to believe that stainless needs to get to about 800F to color. My oven certainly can't do that.
I've heard that welding stainless steel gets it too hot and removes something (the carbon?) essentially de-stainlessing it (?). I wonder how much of that would be happening at these temperatures.
Definitely not going to experiment with this on our 20-year old wedding rings, but it seems like this is very much worth keeping in mind for any potential future projects! Maybe if I ever help one of my kids make their rings for their wedding? :)
Thanks for the idea, and for the link!
I don't know if it's possible, but even if it is, it's not the carbon that makes the steel stainless. It's the additional chromium, nickel, or molybdenum.
Maybe when the steel melts during the welding process, those other metals get separated from the iron.
https://www.materialwelding.com/what-is-sensitization-in-aus...
Taking a completely direction, my wife and I made our own wedding rings out of stainless steel (a low-nickel alloy suitable for contact with skin -- 316L, I think), and we milled them on a lathe in my employer's machine shop after hours. Nearly 20 years later, and they have held up remarkably well.
If you're going to lathe a ring, make sure you do as much shaping and polishing before you detach it from the rest of the rod, and then create a mandrel that is the correct size to hold the ring (using friction) from the other direction. Hammer it onto the mandrel, do your final burr-removal and polishing, then pop it off the hammer.
Important side note: Don't do a test-fit before taking the burr off, or else you'll slice the skin on your finger all the way 'round in a very nice ring-shaped pattern and it will be the absolute dickens to try and get it off. Maybe don't ask me how I know...