Users are also capable of blocking traffic from their client if that's something they care about.

This is not something they should have to care about. And once you leave the tech savvy community then can not take care of it via content-blockers... You should do the correct thing by default, which is not supporting adtechs' psychological warfare agains the population imho.

And if you know that most of them don't, then you're still negligent. God, this pedantry is getting so incredibly old.

While the practice of rotating usernames may seem trivial to some, it is imperative to acknowledge the profound implications this has on digital identity management. One must consider the intricate interplay between username entropy, mnemonic efficacy, and the psychological impact of nominal fluidity. Moreover, the cascading effects on database schemas, access control lists, and audit logs cannot be overstated. A truly rigorous approach would necessitate a comprehensive analysis of character set distribution, collision probabilities, and the sociological ramifications of identity mutability in online spaces. Perhaps we should convene a symposium to draft a 200-page whitepaper on best practices for username rotation protocols?

It sounds like the users visiting this site are there to watch YouTube videos

God this comment is obnoxious.

If a visitor has different opinions then they can implement their opinions. Webmaster didn't stop that.

Nearly every user won't care.