Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for official acts. Parent comment
This case came up because a sitting President supported an insurrection.
The law is about the application of principles.
Sure. The President is elected.
Sure. Prosecutors are not. We don’t trust unelected prosecutors.
Sure. The Judges are not elected…
Therefore We don’t trust judges.
——
Frankly with the powers provided, the dems should really just exercise them.
I’m pretty certain that will immediately shift the narrative.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
This case came up because a sitting President supported an insurrection.
The law is about the application of principles.
Sure. The President is elected.
Sure. Prosecutors are not. We don’t trust unelected prosecutors.
Sure. The Judges are not elected…
Therefore We don’t trust judges.
——
Frankly with the powers provided, the dems should really just exercise them.
I’m pretty certain that will immediately shift the narrative.