News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for official acts. Parent comment

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by tomrod on Monday July 01, 2024 @10:02PM (#40852891)
Did you really refer to charging Trump for several felonies for which there is abundant evidence, "lawfare?" That is a weird way to say "consequences for breaking the law."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by pyuser583 on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @02:14AM (#40853978)
The average American commits three felonies a day.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by reverius42 on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @03:33AM (#40854353)
Then I guess Trump has only been successfully prosecuted (so far) for 11.33 days' actions of his presidency. That's a lot of days to go. I can see why he needs immunity.

Actually based on that logic, we all need immunity! Quick, let's get rid of laws entirely.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by tomrod on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @07:23AM (#40855538)
How many of them involve stealing classified docs?
[ Parent | on HN ]