Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by tick_tock_tick on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @03:27PM
(#40859705)
How is that different then any executive action before the ruling? Presidents attempt to do all sorts of shit and then a judge say no. Literally nothing changed the surprise was it wasn't a 9-0 ruling not anything in the ruling.
After today, if a federal judge arbitrarily decides "it's not", well... it's not.
I suppose if they really wanted to give a reason they could say he's a flight risk or something, it doesn't need to be valid with today's ruling.