News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by foota on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:00PM (#40852167)
Canals would also require drivers for the boats (modulo some AI powered boats or something).

I suspect the real answer here is that the report was just some exploratory thinking, and unlikely to really happen.

Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by bee_rider on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:10PM (#40852238)
I wonder how the ratio of people:stuff breaks down WRT boats and trucks. I’d expect trucks to be much more person intensive, but the vagaries of crew sizes and canal widths could throw that off I guess.
Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by lucumo on Monday July 01, 2024 @09:10PM (#40852625)
I quickly scanned the Rhine Regulations for Navigation Personnel. The tables starting on page 49 show minimum crew requirements for types of ships and operating modes: https://www.ccr-zkr.org/files/documents/reglementSTF/RPN_010...

It seems to go from a single boatmaster to crews of less than 10. The smallest container ships for inland shipping are about 30-ish containers; the largest about 500.

A truck can do 2 containers with 1 driver.

So, an inland ship can do 15-30 times as many containers per crew, compared to a truck.

Re:Japan Wants To Build A 311-Mile Cargo Conveyor Belt due a... by Glyptodon on Monday July 01, 2024 @08:59PM (#40852564)
It seems like a canal with a current could have unmanned pods that behave like items on a conveyor belt. My best guess as to why a cargo belt is that maybe conveyor belts could handle slight elevation changes better than a canal.