Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic...
by mullingitover on Monday July 01, 2024 @07:47PM
(#40852070)
We let them be part of the process by tradition. They’re not constitutional, and they’re irrelevant to the outcome. They’re essentially a participation trophy and they politicize the opinions by offering a glimpse of what could’ve been if the court was packed differently.
The supremes don't always get it right. Dissenting opinions are the mechanism for expressing that reality.