News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for official acts. Parent comment

Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by pseudalopex on Monday July 01, 2024 @03:39PM (#40849727)
> If anyone bothered to read the constitution, it clearly lays out the sorts of things that could be construed as official, and the sorts of things that are not.

6 members of the Supreme Court said Distinguishing the President’s official actions from his unofficial ones can be difficult.[1]

[1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by anon291 on Monday July 01, 2024 @04:14PM (#40850130)
If law weren't difficult, there would be no lawyers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by salawat on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @12:09AM (#40853476)
Backwards.

If there weren't lawyers, law would be oh, so much simpler..

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules ex-presidents have immunity for offic... by anon291 on Tuesday July 02, 2024 @02:16AM (#40853994)
Realistically, not being a lawyer myself, it is painfully obvious that the vast majority of people do not have even a modicum of the nuance necessary to fairly judge anything.
[ Parent | on HN ]