News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf] by throwway120385 on Friday June 28, 2024 @03:03PM (#40823960)
It's pretty much impossible to write a statute to account for every single possible situation and interpretation. In one county where I live we recently had a huge kerfluffle over the county code section about a ferry and ferry fares and what kinds of things the farebox can be spent on. At one point there were three different rewrites of the same statute, all purported to accomplish the same goal, and all markedly different depending on which motivated entity wrote the proposal. At any rate someone still would have needed to interpret the statute.
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf] by sattoshi on Friday June 28, 2024 @03:23PM (#40824204)
The reasonable course of action is to pick one of the three rewrites that codify a proposed interpretation of the currently ambiguous rules.

What would be unreasonable is to give those 3 options to a judge and ask them to do a coin toss on which one is right, and then let it sit that way.

I may be radical in this, but I wish the judiciary could force the legislative branch to decide on what the law they wrote means.