Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf]
by llamaimperative on Friday June 28, 2024 @03:01PM
(#40823935)
Did you forget the first impeachment for withholding critical aid from a buffer country between NATO and USSR-hopeful in exchange for them investigating his political rival?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf]
by briandear on Friday June 28, 2024 @03:35PM
(#40824366)
Ukraine has nothing to do with NATO. If Poland were attacked, then there’d be something to discuss. As an American taxpayer, Ukraine is none of my business. Was Ukraine sending troops to help find Bin Laden when the U.S. was attacked? What strategic value does Ukraine have for the U.S.? Very little. It wasn’t like they were letting us put airbases or missile defense systems in their country. If Russia attacked Finland, Ukraine wouldn’t have done anything.
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf]
by llamaimperative on Friday June 28, 2024 @06:20PM
(#40825916)
Its strategic value is exactly as described: a buffer state. It gives us months, if not years, of warning and can potentially totally rebuff an aggressive Russian state.
To be confused about this at this point reveals either profound ignorance or extreme motivated reasoning.
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf]
by briandear on Friday June 28, 2024 @03:37PM
(#40824382)
Trump was found not guilty in the impeachment trial. Effectively he was “indicted,” but not convicted. So according to the Constitution, he did not do what he was accused of.
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf]
by llamaimperative on Friday June 28, 2024 @06:22PM
(#40825938)
lol, that is absolutely not what “not guilty” means.
That’s why it’s “not guilty” or “acquitted” as opposed to “innocent”
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf]
by AlexandrB on Saturday June 29, 2024 @05:04AM
(#40828857)
I think the point is that, in the eyes of the law, "not guilty" is all that matters. Whether he's "innocent" in some moral or karmic sense is up to God at this point.
Re:Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference [pdf]
by llamaimperative on Saturday June 29, 2024 @07:56AM
(#40829743)
Uhhh I’m not talking about morals or karma whatsoever. I’m talking about factually, what actually occurred. One can look at the timeline of events themselves: $400MM in aid frozen a few days before a phone call with Zelensky in which he pressured an investigation into Biden. The records exist and are unambiguous.
One can absolutely draw their own conclusions separately from what the obvious sycophants in the Senate ruled.
You’re free to take the position that the timeline and transcripts from the call are overruled by your belief in Trump’s and the Senate GOP’s integrity, but that’s not the only reasonable interpretation of events.