Re:How to think about creating a dataset for LLM fine-tuning...
by clarionbell on Thursday June 27, 2024 @08:01AM
(#40809556)
Unless you have GPUs available, LoRa is the only accessible option. That being said, if your task is simple enough, you can skip the problem entirely and just pick a small base model.
Re:How to think about creating a dataset for LLM fine-tuning...
by avgbusinessuser on Thursday June 27, 2024 @09:16AM
(#40810149)
great series of posts, i went down a similar path recently for a slightly different use case - i did not use axolotl though, i was worried about missing out on understanding some details due to potential abstractions. it's great to see documentation on how others tackle similar problems, i documented the process i went through here - https://atredis.com/blog/2024/6/3/how-to-train-your-large-la...
Re:How to think about creating a dataset for LLM fine-tuning...
by strickvl on Thursday June 27, 2024 @09:39AM
(#40810382)
There's a ton of abstraction in axolotl, for sure, but so far I haven't found that it gets in the way. The main competitor in that space seems to be Unsloth, but that only works with a single GPU machine, so didn't fit my purposes. I'll dive into your blogpost. Thanks for posting!
Re:How to think about creating a dataset for LLM fine-tuning...
by hinkley on Thursday June 27, 2024 @12:28PM
(#40812295)
When you get good enough at filtering the dataset for training, do you still need an AI, or do you understand the problem domain and can use a deterministic system?