News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Next gen 3D metal printing by petermcneeley on Wednesday June 26, 2024 @10:42PM (#40806701)
I dont think there was any rigor in modeling of the field. I did this entire project as one semester as one of my last undergrad courses. I wish I had more time and resources for the project but by then I knew I was headed outside the university into software development.

https://darkcephas.github.io/MELED_paper/MELED_paper.pdf

From what I heard the state of the art was to move away from electrodes and to use lasers. So how that works is that you have the normal electrolytic solution but you apply a passive voltage below the activation voltage. Then you use the laser to break down the double layer at the substrate surface. This leads to laser controlled deposition.

Re:Next gen 3D metal printing by kragen on Wednesday June 26, 2024 @11:07PM (#40806821)
neat! i was wondering if that would work last week

i feel like it's probably easier to have 1000 electrodes than 1000 lasers tho

Re:Next gen 3D metal printing by Haemm0r on Wednesday June 26, 2024 @11:49PM (#40806996)
Optics may help to reduce the amount of lasers.
Re:Next gen 3D metal printing by justinclift on Thursday June 27, 2024 @10:57PM (#40817307)
Wonder if using the same approach that resin printers use would work?

• SLA resin printers use a superfast/accurate motorised mirror to direct the laser where its wanted

• mSLA resin printers use a strong light source instead of a laser + an LCD to mask the area they don't want exposed

Re:Next gen 3D metal printing by kragen on Thursday June 27, 2024 @03:38PM (#40814232)
(another issue about lasers is that laser focal spots are pretty big)