Now, as an engineer, I of course value actually building the thing much higher than investing into getting it built, but I still would give the investors some credit for actually believing that Tesla was able to accomplish the very unlikely.
In the context of HN, this is IMHO interesting a) because it's about the engineering feat of building that car and b) about investors investing in something they actually believe in as opposed to something to make a quick buck with.
Instead we learn how a wealthy guy can write a cheque on impulse for a very expensive new car "...and then toss it across the table. Everyone was stunned.”.
I don't begrudge the guy his money. I'm sure he's earned it and he gets to decide how to spend it, but the fawning style of this article annoyed me.
Telsa's technology and Telsa the business are totally on-topic for HN, but this article isn't about any of those things.
And unlike the Roadster, which was a $100K toy for rich people, the Model S is a practical $60K sedan for not-quite-as-rich people.
I worry that the market is leaving Tesla behind, though. With the Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf on the market, not to mention the gorgeous Fisker Karma, the case for a Model S is getting weaker.