News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Record Labels Sue Two Startups for Training AI Models on ... by potatoball on Monday June 24, 2024 @01:07PM (#40778466)
Re:Record Labels Sue Two Startups for Training AI Models on ... by Kim_Bruning on Monday June 24, 2024 @02:46PM (#40779367)
It's easier if you're not trying to make a profit I think. Eg. LAOIN seems to be weathering the inevitable legal storms as well as might be expected.
Re:Record Labels Sue Two Startups for Training AI Models on ... by artninja1988 on Monday June 24, 2024 @03:08PM (#40779559)
Yeah, because:

1. There is a text and data mining exemption for both for profit and non profit in the EU

2. Laions datasets are just lists of links to images on the open Internet together with their alt text

3. Seems to be a much bigger copyright cartel for music than images

Re:Record Labels Sue Two Startups for Training AI Models on ... by zombiefromfo on Monday June 24, 2024 @03:21PM (#40779663)
Good
Re:Record Labels Sue Two Startups for Training AI Models on ... by ChrisArchitect on Monday June 24, 2024 @03:47PM (#40779883)
Home AI Training Is Killing Music

(/s aside, all for this suit)

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Taping_Is_Killing_Music)

Re:Record Labels Sue Two Startups for Training AI Models on ... by bcrl on Monday June 24, 2024 @05:05PM (#40780767)
I think there is a fundamental difference between taping music and using it to create a generative "AI". Artists benefit when their music is more widely distributed (even at a loss) as it provides a larger audience for their merchandise and concerts (which helps them make money). In contrast, a generative AI model gives absolutely nothing back to the artist, and it never will. If artists aren't properly compensated for their work, at some point they will be unable to afford to produce new content. Personally, I want to support the artists that create things I like. Moreove, I think supporting artists is the ethical thing to do in this situation.