Re:Software designers pick the path, not just the destination
by bulletninja on Friday June 21, 2024 @07:15PM
(#40754828)
Wow, very well put. Any suggestions for academic papers, books, or even online resources on these topics would be greatly appreciated.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Software designers pick the path, not just the destination
by Rhapso on Friday June 21, 2024 @07:32PM
(#40754936)
This is related, and it is the paper that lives constantly rent free in my head. I think it will retroactively be viewed as revolutionary: https://www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.p...
Basically, intelligent behavior is optimizing for "future asymptotic entropy" vs maximizing any immediate value. How intelligent a system is then become a measure of how far in the future it can model and optimize entropy effectively for.
(updated with pdf link)
Re:Software designers pick the path, not just the destination
by programjames on Saturday June 22, 2024 @01:10AM
(#40756448)
Great paper! There are some similar ideas to this in game theory and reinforcement learning (RL):
[1]: Thermodynamic Game Theory: https://adamilab.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/AdamiHintze2018....
[2]: piKL - KL-regularized RL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.07544
[3]: Soft-Actor Critic - Entropy-regularized RL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01290
[4]: "Soft" (Boltzmann) Q-learning = Entropy-regularized policy gradients: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06440