News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by ssheng on Thursday June 20, 2024 @12:04PM (#40740252)
How does Exllama rank among these? Heard good things about it.
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by helloericsf on Thursday June 20, 2024 @12:22PM (#40740439)
Seems interesting! https://github.com/turboderp/exllama "A more memory-efficient rewrite of the HF transformers implementation of Llama for use with quantized weights."
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by helloericsf on Thursday June 20, 2024 @12:28PM (#40740499)
4-bit quantization tends to come at the cost of output quality losses. https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/issues/9
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by ssheng on Thursday June 20, 2024 @01:00PM (#40740836)
Quality loss with quantization is expected. It seems like with GPTQ the loss is within acceptable range based on the perplexity score shown.
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by ShawnBasquiat on Thursday June 20, 2024 @12:05PM (#40740260)
Why aren't there more of these benchmark studies? How did TGI make the cut?
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by timliu9 on Thursday June 20, 2024 @11:50AM (#40740092)
Why was onnx not part of the tested runtimes? Seems like an oversight
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by chaoyu on Thursday June 20, 2024 @12:06PM (#40740279)
onnx is not a good option for LLM type of autoregressive generation
Re:Is LMDeploy the Ultimate Solution? Why It Outshines VLLM,... by helloericsf on Thursday June 20, 2024 @12:23PM (#40740442)
Personally, I never seen onnx used for LLM.