What about people opposed to allowing non-doctors to call themselves doctors?
There are a million examples of “censorious impulses” you would not lump in with these, ergo the taxonomy is a bad one.
I did nothing of the sort. You're trying to set up a classic slippery slope fallacy and I'm not going to play that game.
Me: I think alcohol prohibitionists are meddling busybodies. You: Oh, well, I guess you think there's nothing wrong with injecting babies with pure grain alcohol starting at birth.
Me: I think furnaces and central heating are wonderful inventions. You: Oh, well, I guess you think it's okay to go around setting houses on fire.
That's how the game is played. I stopped being impressed by it decades ago. Likely before you were even born.
Bye now!
A censorious impulse is a censorious impulse, after all!
Obviously you can use whatever taxonomy of people you want, but yours seems like an extremely esoteric and rather useless one.