Re:Why Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Mat...
by ricksunny on Monday June 17, 2024 @07:43AM
(#40704598)
Did he study it before or after Doom?
Re:Why Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Mat...
by mpalmer on Monday June 17, 2024 @07:56AM
(#40704681)
This question is answered immediately in the linked video.
Re:Why Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Mat...
by replygirl on Monday June 17, 2024 @08:01AM
(#40704716)
this takes a lot longer to type than before or after
Re:Why Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Mat...
by vitus on Monday June 17, 2024 @09:07AM
(#40705248)
11 minutes in, he mentions SICP as a book that he ended up working through exercises "in the past year" (so 2012 timeframe, well after the original Doom but before the reboot).
Re:Why Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Mat...
by ricksunny on Monday June 17, 2024 @12:25PM
(#40707468)
Thank you! :) Provides helpful context vis-a-vis evaluating possible critical-path enabling / contributing factors to achieving a key milestone.
Re:Why Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Mat...
by mpalmer on Monday June 17, 2024 @09:24AM
(#40705393)
Think how long it would have taken to click the link!
Re:Why Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs Mat...
by ricksunny on Monday June 17, 2024 @12:28PM
(#40707519)
(About 9 minutes, acc. to the parallel subthread. My time on this thread is about 90 seconds so far not incl this current comment.)
There's an old video [0] where he talks in-depth about his explorations of functional programming. It's perhaps a bit more about Haskell than about SICP, but in it he's also quite enthusiastic about what a veteran programmer can still learn from this book.
[0] https://youtu.be/1PhArSujR_A?si=OD8pGYsoGC7RXPVG&t=125