News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experts vs. Imitators by Espressosaurus on Sunday June 16, 2024 @03:28PM (#40699442)
Agreed. My experience with experts--both being one in my domain and working with others in their domain--is that if they can't explain how it works to a layman, chances are they don't know how it works.

True experts can understand from the layman's perspective and tailor the response to that level of understanding.

Re:Experts vs. Imitators by 77pt77 on Sunday June 16, 2024 @04:56PM (#40700046)
> True experts can understand from the layman's perspective and tailor the response to that level of understanding.

The Feynman paradox:

> if you can't explain it to a six-year-old you don't understand it yourself

but also

> If I could explain it to the average person, I wouldn't have been worth the Nobel Prize

The former probably apocryphal.

Re:Experts vs. Imitators by qrian on Sunday June 16, 2024 @09:33PM (#40701560)
Interestingly I have recently watched a video of Feynmann essentially saying "I cannot explain it to you because you don't have relevant background knowledge" to a question of "What makes magnets repel or pull each other?". Which agrees with the latter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8

Re:Experts vs. Imitators by 77pt77 on Sunday June 16, 2024 @10:26PM (#40701832)
Of both quotes the latter is definitely closer to the truth.
Re:Experts vs. Imitators by jltsiren on Sunday June 16, 2024 @07:24PM (#40700942)
Then there is the corollary: a topic is shallow, if an expert can explain it to a layman before the layman loses interest.

I've been working with experts on highly technical topics most of my career. They can explain the big picture to a layman just fine, but if the layman asks something within the actual scope of their expertise, it takes a long time to get there.