Leveraging Zig's Allocators

Re:Leveraging Zig's Allocators by 10000truths on Saturday June 15, 2024 @06:22PM (#40693136)

Sure, but in most practical applications where an HTTP server is involved, zeroing the request/response buffer memory is very unlikely to ever be your bottleneck. Even at 10K RPS per core, your per-request CPU time budget is 100 microseconds. Zeroing memory will only account for a fraction of a percentage of that.

If you're exposing an HTTP API to clients, it's likely that any response's contents will contain sensitive client-specific data. If memory corruption bugs are more likely than bottlenecking on zeroing out your request/response buffer, then zeroing the request/response buffer is a good idea, until proven otherwise by benchmarks or profiling.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Leveraging Zig's Allocators by adgjlsfhk1 on Saturday June 15, 2024 @08:26PM (#40693704)

Zeroing on allocation is much more sensible though because that way you preload the memory into your caches as opposed to on deallocation where you bring memory into cache that you know you no longer care about. Also if you do the zero on allocation, the compiler can delete it if it can prove that you write to the memory before reading to it.

[ Parent | on HN ]