Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by Sharlin on Sunday June 16, 2024 @06:28AM
(#40695999)
It's just a question of funding. There's nothing that's needed to accelerate small enough probe on an escape trajectory at a few hundred km/s except plain old chemical rockets with enough stages. If we can accelerate a >500 kg probe to 20 km/s, we can certainly use an extra stage with 400 kg of propellant to boost a 1 kg probe to much higher velocities.
And nobody talked about the next ten years. The GP said "fifty years", which is way too long a time span to have any certainty whatsoever as to what will happen. GP's assertion was 100% ludicrously overconfident.
Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by karaterobot on Sunday June 16, 2024 @11:13AM
(#40697672)
Just a note: I responded directly to a comment that said it could be built with today's tech, let alone 10, 20, or 50 years.
Re:Voyager 1 is back online! NASA spacecraft returns data fr...
by Sharlin on Sunday June 16, 2024 @12:42PM
(#40698361)
Ah, yes, it was my own comment :D Sorry for the confusion. What I meant was that bog-standard chemical rockets work just fine for ~100 km/s if the payload mass is low enough and you use enough stages.
I'm just thinking about my old roommate, a space science postdoc, who told me about all these cool propulsion projects that sounded very feasible. That was—sheesh—20 years ago, and I keep waiting for any of them to be real.