News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anders Hejlsberg Is Right: You Cannot Maintain Large Prog... by mickeyp on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @06:19AM (#4068094)
I didn't look, tbh. Python 3 already has type annotations, but what interests me if how do you nail down types whilst preserving duck typing, or dealing with a method that is already passed duck typed objects.
Re:Anders Hejlsberg Is Right: You Cannot Maintain Large Prog... by berntb on Tuesday June 05, 2012 @06:45AM (#4068133)
I'm not going to copy/paste the content/source from links I've given. :-)

(There are easy-to-read abstracts/"synopsis" at the start of both pages.)